tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45880918050262845112024-03-13T10:04:28.698-07:00Asiana21Un blog sobre Asia en el siglo XXI // A Blog on Asia in the 21st CenturyPablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.comBlogger1615125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-30914435093244848142013-09-12T03:31:00.001-07:002013-09-12T03:31:49.893-07:00YONGBYON RESTARTED<p><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-XQXaQQE8J3U/UjGYES8DH5I/AAAAAAAAJBs/7V7NGFi7mZU/s1600-h/BBC%252520News%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="BBC News" border="0" alt="BBC News" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-TIGhfIcpQww/UjGYFLNjsZI/AAAAAAAAJB0/4BjjvRP6i00/BBC%252520News_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="398" height="252" /></a></p> <h3>NORTH KOREA'S YONGBYON REACTOR 'NEARING OPERATION'</h3> <p><font size="3"><em>Steam has been seen rising from North Korea's Yongbyon nuclear facility, suggesting that the reactor has been restarted, a US institute says.</em></font></p> <p><font size="3">BBC News, September 12, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">The colour and volume of the steam indicated that the reactor was in or nearing operation, the institute said.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Pyongyang vowed to restart facilities at its main Yongbyon nuclear complex in April, amid high regional tensions.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The reactor can produce plutonium, which North Korea could use to make nuclear weapons.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22006636"><b><font size="3">Analysts believe</font></b></a><font size="3"> North Korea already possesses between four and 10 nuclear weapons, based on plutonium produced at the Yongbyon reactor prior to mid-2007, when the facility was closed down.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24058708">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-39721717077528093482013-09-03T04:48:00.001-07:002013-09-03T04:48:29.345-07:00FACTORIES IN BANGLADESH<p><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-WR5Tev48zTY/UiXMifhV5eI/AAAAAAAAJBU/qC0IjxhuoPg/s1600-h/Time%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img title="Time" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Time" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-IquIXSCLIts/UiXMiwSF_fI/AAAAAAAAJBc/t1inU96roN8/Time_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="359" height="153" /></a></p> <h3>HELL FOR LEATHER: BANGLADESH’S TOXIC TANNERIES RAVAGE LIVES AND ENVIRONMENT</h3> <p><font size="3">Jason Motlagh / Dhaka</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Time</em>, September 3, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Inside the factory, shirtless workers stretch freshly dyed sheets of goat leather across industrial drying racks. Sleek and durable, the leather is in great demand at fashion houses from Italy to Hong Kong, feeding a global appetite for Bangladesh-made clothing that has boosted the country’s export earnings more than 20% in the past year. But outside, under the glaring sun, it’s clear who’s paying the price. Toxic runoff, the color of crude oil, is discharged into open gutters that course their way through jam-packed streets and makeshift housing, en route to city waterways. Seated by one of the gutters on his tea break is a gaunt Saddam Hossein — he is 23, but looking 10 years older and his hands are scarred from processing chemicals. “It’s hard labor,” he says. “But what else can I do?”</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bangladesh has become synonymous with cheap, ready-made garments and — in the wake of April’s </font><a href="http://world.time.com/2013/04/26/dying-for-some-new-clothes-the-tragedy-of-rana-plaza/http://"><font size="3">Rana Plaza</font></a><font size="3"> disaster — the appalling cost of fast fashion. Less notorious but no less grim is its booming leather industry, where workers and environment are degraded to sustain a billion-dollar business. Nearly all the country’s 206 tanneries are concentrated in one area — </font><a href="http://www.dhakatribune.com/environment/2013/jun/05/hazardous-hazaribagh"><font size="3">Hazaribagh</font></a><font size="3">, a cramped, filthy neighborhood in southwestern Dhaka, the sprawling capital.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://world.time.com/2013/09/03/hell-for-leather-bangladeshs-toxic-tanneries-ravage-lives-and-environment/?iid=gs-main-lead">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-85225431221830193352013-08-29T06:43:00.001-07:002013-08-29T06:43:31.344-07:00CHINA’S AGING AND MEDICAL CARE<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-ijWXN4yPLjU/Uh9P_-fkQyI/AAAAAAAAJA8/IbZRVZCeigs/s1600-h/Bloomberg_logo%25255B3%25255D.png"><img title="Bloomberg_logo" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Bloomberg_logo" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-77kTRULmDxQ/Uh9QAdGRr4I/AAAAAAAAJBE/Vts3f4e31Co/Bloomberg_logo_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800" width="364" height="104" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA SEEKS WESTERN-STYLE CARE AMID EXPLOSION OF ELDERLY</h3> <p><font size="3">Natasha Khan</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg, August 28, 2013</font></p> <p><cite><font size="3"></font></cite></p> <p><font size="3">The Chinese increasingly eat, shop and play in ways their Western counterparts would instantly recognize. They’re aging like them too, living longer lives that are often limited by debilitating illnesses. </font></p> <p><font size="3">As the almost 200 million population of over-60s more than doubles in the next 40 years, China faces a deluge of infirm elderly who can’t live alone. Nor can they rely on Confucian tradition of children caring for their parents: the country’s one-child policy has left fewer offspring to share the load, while more Chinese are moving away from home to study or work. </font></p> <p><font size="3">While China spent 1.1 trillion yuan ($179.7 billion) over the past four years to cut the cost of drugs and provide basic medical coverage for more than 90 percent of its 1.3 billion people, services for the elderly have fallen behind. To plug the gap, Premier Li Keqiang said Aug. 16 the government will cut red tape and costs to spur foreign investment into the type of privately funded care that is common in the West. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“They’re going to be struggling with an enormous burden in terms of caring for their elderly,” said Benjamin Shobert, managing director of Rubicon Strategy Group in Seattle, which advises companies on how to enter Asian health-care markets. “They don’t really have two bites of the apple. Purely from a time-frame point of view, the next 10 years are critical.” </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-28/china-seeks-western-style-care-amid-explosion-of-elderly.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-57210617537364853912013-08-28T04:44:00.001-07:002013-08-28T04:44:48.706-07:00THE INDIAN RUPEE DECLINE<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-sgV37-pihCQ/Uh3irNktjwI/AAAAAAAAJAk/Z_RNIXheA4g/s1600-h/Firstpost%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img title="Firstpost" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Firstpost" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-W-Qn61T-Mg0/Uh3iroUHsWI/AAAAAAAAJAs/0oBb-fi6lnk/Firstpost_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="350" height="128" /></a></p> <h3>RUPEE BREACHES 67: FOUR MYTHS ABOUT INDIA AND THE POLITICS OF PESSIMISM</h3> <p><font size="3">Rajesh Pandathil </font></p> <p><font size="3">Firstpost, August 28, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Why this panic about the rupee decline, asked </font><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/rupee-panic/?_r=0"><font size="3">Paul Krugman on 20 August</font></a><font size="3">, a day when the currency hit 64.13 forcing the RBI to intervene to pull it back to 63.25 levels at the close.</font></p> <p><font size="3">His contention was that a panic was unwarranted now as India's dollar denominated debt situation is not like the Asian crisis countries of 1997-1998 or Argentina in 2001 and the fall in the rupee was in line with the emerging market currencies.</font></p> <p><font size="3">“Now, the depreciation of the rupee will presumably lead to a spike in inflation - but it should be temporary. So at first examination this doesn't look like as big a deal as some headlines are suggesting. What am I missing?,” he said in his blog.</font></p> <p><font size="3">But then the rupee's record low was 64.13, a level which now looks like a strong one. The rupee has fallen 65 and 66 in a matter of 7-8 days and looks set to reach 70 faster than expected.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The Indian rupee breached the 67-mark in early trade Wednesday, hitting a record low of 67.98 against the dollar in a couple of minutes of trade.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.firstpost.com/economy/rupee-breaches-67-four-myths-about-india-and-the-politics-of-pessimism-1065495.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-59695433579334363812013-08-27T03:03:00.001-07:002013-08-27T03:04:38.286-07:00SIX-WAY TALKS<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-sty6TYjhdiw/Uhx5fPAeBLI/AAAAAAAAJAM/2334lKVafOg/s1600-h/Yonhap%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img title="Yonhap" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Yonhap" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-N8_QivohTRk/Uhx5fZ5SfdI/AAAAAAAAJAQ/lN9zv0G52VE/Yonhap_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="352" height="71" /></a></p> <h3>10 YEARS AFTER LAUNCH, SIX-WAY TALKS REMAIN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO DENUKE NORTH</h3> <p><font size="3">Yonhap, August 27, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">SEOUL. Aug. 27 (Yonhap) -- Ten years after the six-party talks' launch, the multilateral dialogue has fallen short of disarming North Korea, but the now long-stalled talks are still seen as an effective tool to denuclearize the communist country, analysts said Tuesday.</font></p> <p><font size="3">On Aug. 27, 2003, six nations - the two Koreas, the United States, China, Russia and Japan -- opened their first negotiations in Beijing in multilateral efforts to end the North's nuclear program, deemed a security threat to the region. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The advent of the six-party talks followed escalating security concerns surrounding the reclusive North's growing nuclear capacities. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Amid rising U.S. allegations that the North started an illegal enriched uranium weapons program, the North withdrew in January 2003 from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, an international treaty to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, triggering anxieties among neighbors over the North's nuclear ambitions.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Washington's previous attempts to denuclearize the North also ended in failure when the North defaulted in 2002 on the Agreed Framework, under which the North agreed in 1994 with the U.S. to freeze its plutonium-producing nuclear facilities.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2013/08/27/5/0301000000AEN20130827008500315F.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-13338148062241457242013-06-24T08:54:00.001-07:002013-06-24T08:54:39.661-07:00CHINA’S SHADOW BANKING<p><a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-tWCY211-VE4/Uchrt3RNqLI/AAAAAAAAIxM/qdRmnc6dT3I/s1600-h/BBC%252520News%25255B2%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="BBC News" border="0" alt="BBC News" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-Tt___M-G32g/UchrvL6KTaI/AAAAAAAAIxU/jKb9_rQ2B28/BBC%252520News_thumb.jpg?imgmax=800" width="244" height="244" /></a></p> <h3>CASH CRUNCH? CHINA'S TRUE CRUNCH TIME IS YET TO COME</h3> <p><font size="3"><em>China's 'shadow banking' sector could pose serious problems for the country in future</em></font> </p> <p><font size="3">Linda Yueh</font></p> <p><font size="3">BBC News, June 24, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">How can a largely state-owned banking system experience a credit crunch? When the central bank decides to rein back credit.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The Chinese central bank has been reining back credit for some time now as it has sought to control housing prices. But, when the cheap money from the rest of the world began reversing <b><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22902621">(see my post on Great Reversal part II)</a></b> due to the Fed signalling an end date for the era of cheap money, funds leaving emerging economies like China have made the situation more apparent.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Last week, the overnight lending rate between banks jumped to exceed 25% as banks became reluctant to lend to each other. But the lending rates fell again when the state-owned banks fell into line and resumed lending to each other.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Now, the Chinese central bank says that liquidity is "ample" and essentially indicated that it will not inject more cash, holding firm on the line of controlling credit growth in the economy.</font></p> <p><font size="3">As a result, the Chinese stock market fell into bear market territory led by the decline of banks. In other words, banks can't count on the central bank for cheap cash. In fact, the central bank wants to root out the poorly performing banks - especially those in the so-called shadow banking system.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23035230">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-88113809518266385222013-06-20T13:19:00.001-07:002013-06-20T13:19:35.282-07:00JAPAN’S FISCAL STIMULUS<p><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-2a-uQ1tgDEE/UcNjz1UxUqI/AAAAAAAAIuM/WSTGVKyqzNE/s1600-h/Bloomberg_logo%25255B3%25255D.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bloomberg_logo" border="0" alt="Bloomberg_logo" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-40Sw0aDUaFY/UcNj1IIKJgI/AAAAAAAAIuU/-JoSDsUtHwU/Bloomberg_logo_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800" width="329" height="95" /></a></p> <h3>JAPAN TO CONSIDER FISCAL STEPS TO COUNTER HIT FROM TAX RISE</h3> <p><font size="3">Mayumi Otsuma and Kyoko Shimodoi</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg, June 20, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Japan’s government is ready to provide extra spending if a sales-tax increase next year damps economic growth, a senior finance ministry official said. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“We must take appropriate action to counter” any decline in economic growth after the tax increase planned for April, Yuzuru Takeuchi, 54, parliamentary secretary for finance and a lower house legislator, said in an interview today in Tokyo. The government will also create a panel to encourage companies to raise wages, he said. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is rolling out fiscal and monetary stimulus to help pull the economy out of a more than decade-long deflationary malaise. The government is grappling with supporting growth while trying to slow the increase in Japan’s debt burden, the developed world’s largest. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“If the government doesn’t announce a further fiscal package, we’re likely to see some payback” in growth from the boost in 2013 from government spending, said Masaaki Kanno, chief Japan economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Tokyo. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The economy may shrink an annualized 3.9 percent in the second quarter of 2014 after the sales tax is raised to 8 percent from its current 5 percent, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The tax will be further increased to 10 percent in 2015. </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-20/japan-to-consider-fiscal-steps-to-counter-tax-rise-hit-to-growth.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-33107242867110401932013-06-19T03:13:00.001-07:002013-06-19T03:13:30.406-07:00CHINA AND NORTH KOREA<p><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-JAqibqJ82yo/UcGESMM252I/AAAAAAAAItU/hhb57_aju-w/s1600-h/Bangkok%252520Post%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img title="Bangkok Post" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Bangkok Post" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-gxwF-GjPNgU/UcGESZAyjiI/AAAAAAAAItc/ugu7FAl2p1I/Bangkok%252520Post_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="349" height="47" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA, NKOREA HOLD 'STRATEGIC DIALOGUE': OFFICIALS</h3> <p><font size="3"><em>Bangkok Post</em>, June 19, 2013</font></p> <p><a href="/"><font size="3"></font></a></p> <p><font size="3">A high-ranking North Korean official with long experience as his country's international nuclear negotiator held talks Wednesday with Chinese officials, Beijing's foreign ministry announced.</font></p> <p><font size="3">North Korean first vice foreign minister Kim Kye-Gwan and Chinese vice foreign minister Zhang Yesui co-chaired a "strategic dialogue" meeting between their ministries in the Chinese capital, foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said.</font></p> <p><font size="3">"The two sides exchanged views on China-DPRK relations and the situation on the Korean peninsula," she told a regular briefing, referring to North Korea by the acronym of its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Kim also met Wu Dawei, China's special envoy for Korean peninsula affairs, Hua said.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The talks come amid ongoing tensions on the peninsula over the North's nuclear programme and mark the second high-level visit to China in less than a month by a North Korean official.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The visit also coincides with talks in Seoul on Wednesday and Thursday between United Nations' chief Ban Ki-moon and Chinese leaders.</font></p> <p><font size="3">China has come under pressure to encourage North Korea to halt its nuclear programme after the reclusive nation in February carried out its third underground nuclear test, which brought worldwide condemnation.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asia/355901/china-nkorea-hold-trategic-dialogue-officials">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-74354870340934325962013-06-18T09:17:00.001-07:002013-06-18T09:17:33.221-07:00CHINA’S PROPERTY PRICES<p><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-7m5jKi44Wws/UcCIFq_H24I/AAAAAAAAIs4/dxX0ERfP0nw/s1600-h/Bloomberg_logo%25255B3%25255D.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bloomberg_logo" border="0" alt="Bloomberg_logo" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-oOAuEDMv4us/UcCIG15h_nI/AAAAAAAAItA/Ad1ORBjOmng/Bloomberg_logo_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800" width="399" height="114" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA HOME-PRICE GAINS ADD TO DILEMMA ON CASH CRUNCH: ECONOMY</h3> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg News</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg, June 18, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Chinese property prices rose at the fastest pace in more than two years in major cities, defying tougher government curbs and constraining the ability of policy makers to ease credit in response to weakening economic growth. </font></p> <p><font size="3">New home prices in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou posted the biggest gains in May since at least January 2011, and 69 of the 70 cities tracked by the government showed increases, the most since August 2011, National Bureau of Statistics data showed today in Beijing. Inbound non-financial investment rose 0.3 percent in May from a year earlier, the weakest in four months, according to the Ministry of Commerce. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The property gains limit the ability of Premier Li Keqiang to counter an economic slowdown that showed signs of deepening in May. The central bank today refrained from adding cash to the financial system and money-market rates reached the highest level in seven years this month, a liquidity squeeze that Fitch Ratings says may accelerate a banking crisis. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“The government is in a dilemma right now,” said Zhang Zhiwei, Hong Kong-based chief China economist at Nomura Holdings Inc., who previously worked at the International Monetary Fund.“It’s difficult for China to tighten the property market, while it also needs to bolster the economy, which has a strong reliance on property.” </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article </font><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-18/china-may-home-prices-rise-as-major-cities-post-record-gains-1-.html"><font size="3">here</font></a><font size="3">]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-7500738373135402062013-06-17T01:50:00.001-07:002013-06-17T01:50:25.267-07:00CHINA AND THE SERVICE SECTOR<p><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-h-sB5RI655g/Ub7Nw0K6CzI/AAAAAAAAIsQ/c6zCZmS3HWM/s1600-h/The%252520China%252520Post%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The China Post" border="0" alt="The China Post" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-3qxD9Rq2eAo/Ub7NzfeaKEI/AAAAAAAAIsY/pcW9LbufFbg/The%252520China%252520Post_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="364" height="88" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA SETS FOCUS ON SERVICE INDUSTRIES</h3> <p><font size="3">Bao Chang</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The China Post</em>, June 17, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">WU--I -- Now is the best time for China to develop its service trade, and the country can become one of the biggest outsourcing service providers in the world within the next few years, Wei Jianguo, former vice minister of commerce and secretary-general of China Center for International Economic Exchanges, said on Saturday. </font></p> <p><font size="3">At present, outsourcing service buyers in developed economies are moving their focus from investing in labor-intensive industries to the outsourcing service in high technology and research and development sectors. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“China should seize this unprecedented opportunity and get a foothold in the transaction of the world's service trade and gain an advantage compared with other emerging economies which are also seeking new opportunities in the outsourcing industry upgrading,” Wei said. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Wei was speaking at the Sixth Global Outsourcing Summit in Wuxi, in East China's Jiangsu province. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Jointly organized by the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation under the Ministry of Commerce, the Asia-Pacific CEO Association and the People's Government of Wuxi Municipality, the summit targets the promotion of multinational outsourcing and insourcing cooperation, and looks at the city's transformation amid economic globalization.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia-china/2013/06/17/381431/China-sets.htm">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-77227483384892589842013-06-16T00:19:00.001-07:002013-06-16T00:19:39.819-07:00NORTH KOREA’S PROPOSED TALKS WITH THE US<p><a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-jblYY_ipDm0/Ub1nBjO5puI/AAAAAAAAIn4/mJRsZT9BgcU/s1600-h/Bloomberg_logo3.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bloomberg_logo" border="0" alt="Bloomberg_logo" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-TD42fF7Cr9o/Ub1nCmFrUaI/AAAAAAAAIoA/n3E46SDMZWw/Bloomberg_logo_thumb1.png?imgmax=800" width="361" height="104" /></a></p> <h3>N. KOREA PROPOSES U.S. TALKS ON PEACE TREATY, DENUCLEARIZATION</h3> <p><font size="3">Sangwon Yoon and Rose Kim</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg, June 16, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">North Korea proposed its first talks with the U.S. in more than a year to discuss nuclear disarmament and a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War, less than a week after it scrapped a meeting with the South. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Any talks must have no preconditions, an unidentified spokesperson of North Korea’s National Defense Commission said in a statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency. North Korea confirmed its denuclearization commitment on condition that it’s discussed as part of broader talks toward a“nuclear free world,” the commission headed by North Korean leader </font><a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Kim%20Jong%20Un&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1&partialfields=-wnnis:NOAVSYND&lr=-lang_ja"><font size="3">Kim Jong Un</font></a><font size="3"> said. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The U.S. is unlikely to agree to today’s proposal after repeatedly demanding North Korea take steps toward disarmament as a condition for any dialogue. China, North Korea’s biggest benefactor, has also taken a tougher stance against Kim’s regime after it tested an atomic weapon in February and threatened pre-emptive nuclear strikes in response to sanctions. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“There is no sincerity in North Korea’s offer today for dialogue with U.S., nor do the Americans have any reason to accept the proposal when the North shows no change in its stance regarding its nuclear weapons program,” Park Young Ho, senior research fellow at the state-run Korea Institute for National Unification in Seoul, said by phone today. “Ultimately the offer is aimed to appease China, to show that the North is heeding Beijing’s calls for a return to dialogue.” </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-16/n-korea-proposes-high-level-talks-with-u-s-to-ease-tensions.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-76058492716108276042013-06-15T00:51:00.001-07:002013-06-15T00:51:28.040-07:00AIR POLLUTION AND SOLAR ENERGY IN CHINA<a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-yqDOUKneNdw/Ubwc-i8k_9I/AAAAAAAAIng/yAlv4x3WbVI/s1600-h/Reuters%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Reuters" border="0" alt="Reuters" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-GS5liXM67Yw/Ubwc_rBtebI/AAAAAAAAIno/Yt-ZVMBS9jo/Reuters_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="357" height="125" /></a> <h3>CHINA MAKES FRESH PROMISES ON AIR POLLUTION, PLEDGES SUPPORT FOR SOLAR</h3> <p><font size="3">Reuters, June 15, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China's cabinet approved new measures to combat air pollution on Friday, in the latest step by China's new leadership to address the country's enormous environmental problems, with pollution a key source of rising social discontent in China.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The government also promised to support China's troubled solar power industry, despite problems with overcapacity and ongoing trade disputes with the United States and Europe.</font></p> <p><font size="3">In a meeting chaired by Premier Li Keqiang, the State Council approved 10 anti-pollution measures, the council said in a statement posted on its website late Friday.</font></p> <p><font size="3">In particular, the State Council promised to:</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Accelerate the installation of pollution control equipment on small, coal-fuelled refineries.</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Curb the growth of high-energy-consuming industries like steel, cement, aluminum, and glass.</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Reduce emissions per unit of GDP in key industries by at least 30 percent by the end of 2017.</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Improve indicators used to evaluate the environmental impact of new projects and deny administrative approvals, financing, land, and other support to projects that fail to meet high standards.</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Strengthen enforcement and collection of fees and penalties that companies pay based on their emissions.</font></p> <p><font size="3">- Use legal action to force industries to upgrade pollution controls and establish or revise industry-level emissions standards.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/15/us-china-pollution-policy-idUSBRE95E03T20130615?feedType=RSS&feedName=lifestyleMolt">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-33597072280785667682013-06-13T07:59:00.001-07:002013-06-13T07:59:57.078-07:00THE CHANGING ECOMOMIC DYNAMICS IN ASIA<p><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-XMqYt_q2n98/UbneXR2_jwI/AAAAAAAAInI/Q2_mmleRxzY/s1600-h/Business%252520Spectator%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Business Spectator" border="0" alt="Business Spectator" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-UD6cMnKAN2U/UbneaenuCJI/AAAAAAAAInQ/fPJFrbB_yd8/Business%252520Spectator_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="380" height="56" /></a></p> <h3>WHAT ASIA'S NEW GROWTH TACK MEANS FOR INVESTORS</h3> <p><font size="3"><em>Asia has been a driving force behind global growth since the financial crisis. But the dynamics are changing as growth slows in China and Australia, and Japan pursues “hyperactive” monetary policy. In this issue of our</em> <em>Secular Outlook Series, portfolio managers Ramin Toloui, Tomoya Masanao and Robert Mead discuss how these developments are affecting the global outlook for the next three to five years and the implications for investors.</em></font></p> <p><em><font size="3"></font></em></p> <p><font size="3">PIMCO</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Business Spectator</em>, June 13, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3"><strong>Question: </strong>What is PIMCO’s secular outlook for Asia? </font></p> <p><font size="3"><strong>Ramin Toloui:</strong> Asia has been the critical driver of the global economy during the past five years, providing by far the largest contribution to global GDP growth of any region. China has been at the centre of Asia’s growth story, so the most important question for Asia’s secular outlook is: Can China maintain high rates of economic growth in the years ahead?</font></p> <p><font size="3">Our view is that Chinese GDP growth will downshift, averaging 6 per cent to 7.5 per cent annually for the next five years versus more than 9 per cent on average for the past five. The reason is that the previous engines of Chinese growth – net exports and investment – are reaching their limits. Prospects for export-led growth are inhibited by China’s large size in a global marketplace that remains deficient in aggregate demand due to high indebtedness in the developed world. Investment cannot play its previous role in driving growth because it has already risen to almost 50 per cent of GDP – up from 35 per cent in 2000 and from 42 per cent in 2007 before the global financial crisis – an extraordinary ratio by historical standards.</font></p> <p><font size="3">To sustain growth, China’s economy needs to shift to greater reliance on household demand. The good news is that the potential is extraordinary after more than a decade in which consumption has declined from 46 per cent to 35 per cent of GDP. Latent demand for not only consumer goods but also services such as health care is likely enormous. However, turning that potential into reality requires changes in economic policy that are wide-ranging and difficult, and also challenge vested interests among the political and industrial elite.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/6/13/economy/what-asias-new-growth-tack-means-investors">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-84559853918211936032013-06-12T04:35:00.001-07:002013-06-12T04:35:49.720-07:00JEMAAH ISLAMIYAH<h3><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-GQ295uqBmVw/Ubhc_45jSBI/AAAAAAAAImw/-FjXD_xeI0g/s1600-h/Asia%252520Times%2525202%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Asia Times 2" border="0" alt="Asia Times 2" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-fl_yYwdlM60/UbhdAglDmnI/AAAAAAAAIm4/JhU5TawSVok/Asia%252520Times%2525202_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="307" height="97" /></a>NEXT GENERATION RADICALS IN INDONESIA</h3> <p><font size="3">Jacob Zenn</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Asia Times</em>, June 12, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">JAKARTA - Driven by strong exports and buoyant domestic markets, Indonesia is projected to be among the world's top 10 economies by 2025. While the future looks bright for Southeast Asia's largest economy, a growing tide of religious intolerance threatens to undermine those gains. Where officials have in the past attributed religious violence and terrorism to foreign influenced groups, now the threats to stability are more clearly homegrown. </font></p> <p><font size="3">In the late 1990s and 2000s Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) was the main threat in Indonesia. The radical group attacked foreign tourists in Bali in 2002 and 2005, the Australian embassy in Jakarta in 2004, the J W Marriott hotel in Jakarta in 2003 and 2009, and the Ritz Carlton hotel in the capital city in 2009. </font></p> <p><font size="3">JI was largely considered a Malaysian import to Indonesia, with most of the extremist group's key members having fought in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union in the 1980s or in the 1990s with the Taliban again its domestic rival the Northern Alliance. Most of JI's key members are now either in prison or have been killed by Indonesia's elite counter-terrorism force, Detachment 88 (or Densus 88). </font></p> <p><font size="3">In November 2012, one of JI's Indonesian-born and bred members, the Poso native Upik Lawanga (aka Taufiq Buraga), was captured trying to cross from East Kalimantan, Indonesia to Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. Lawanga was allegedly involved in the beheading of three Christian students in Poso, church bombings in nearby Palu in 2005, the two hotel bombings in Jakarta in 2009, and suicide bombings at a mosque in a police compound in Cirebon and a church in Solo in 2011.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/SEA-01-120613.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-54648355525928055582013-06-11T11:31:00.001-07:002013-06-11T11:31:06.101-07:00US, CHINA, AND INDIA<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-xbmNzaG4WB0/Ubds5mkNkKI/AAAAAAAAIj8/z4WWOb46ElM/s1600-h/The%252520Indian%252520Express%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Indian Express" border="0" alt="The Indian Express" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-JXJ_2sO9NF4/Ubds6GKwfvI/AAAAAAAAIkE/P51oYtORkXE/The%252520Indian%252520Express_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="386" height="58" /></a></p> <h3>THE G-2 DILEMMA</h3> <p><font size="3"><em>The current dynamic between the US and China poses challenges for Delhi</em><b> </b></font></p> <p><font size="3">C. Raja Mohan </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The Indian Express</em>, June 11, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">The informal California summit over the weekend between the US and Chinese presidents, Barack Obama and Xi Jinping has unveiled a new phase in great power relations and demands a significant recalibration of India’s recent foreign policy assumptions. Although the summit did not produce any major breakthroughs, its very conception is based on the American recognition that a measure of political understanding with China is necessary for the management of the challenges confronting Asia and the world.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Any talk of US-China collaboration makes India rather nervous. Two recent occasions come to mind. In June 1998, barely weeks after the Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests, presidents Bill Clinton and Jiang Zemin declared the intent to build a strategic partnership and promote non-proliferation in the subcontinent. New Delhi went into a paroxysm denouncing the prospects for a Sino-US “condominium” in Asia.</font></p> <p><font size="3">In a Beijing summit in November 2009, Obama and Hu Jintao declared their commitment to seek stability in the subcontinent. Travelling to the US three weeks later, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh sought assurances from the US president that Washington’s partnership with Beijing will not be at the expense of Delhi. Looking back a little further, in the early years of the Cold War, India continually urged America and the Soviet Union to end their confrontation and seek peaceful coexistence. When America and Russia sought to achieve precisely those objectives in the 1970s, Delhi became anxious about superpower hegemony and protested nuclear agreements between them that constrained India’s strategic options.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The current dynamic between America and China will pose even greater challenges to Delhi. In the 1970s, Delhi neutralised the impact of Sino-American rapprochement by a tighter embrace of Soviet Russia. Today, Moscow is much closer to Beijing and is not eager to balance a rising China.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-g2-dilemma/1127572/0">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-32556712091189685092013-06-10T04:22:00.001-07:002013-06-10T04:22:57.707-07:00WEAKER DEMAND IN CHINA<p><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-7S-_vok0BiY/UbW3DfWLbxI/AAAAAAAAIjk/Y5G-7MyY3Ws/s1600-h/Bloomberg_logo%25255B3%25255D.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bloomberg_logo" border="0" alt="Bloomberg_logo" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-1NUgApy5UPQ/UbW3EGl0LZI/AAAAAAAAIjs/KTcXpW785F0/Bloomberg_logo_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800" width="396" height="113" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA LEADERS TESTED ON GROWTH RESOLVE AFTER SLOWDOWN: ECONOMY</h3> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg News</font></p> <p><font size="3">Bloomberg, Jun 10, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">China’s new leaders face a test of their resolve to forgo short-term stimulus for slower, more-sustainable growth after May trade, inflation and lending data trailed estimates, signaling weaker global and domestic demand. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Industrial production rose a less-than-forecast 9.2 percent from a year earlier and factory-gate prices fell for a 15th month, National Bureau of Statistics data showed yesterday in Beijing. Export gains were at a 10-month low and imports dropped after a crackdown on fake trade invoices while fixed-asset investment growth moderated and new yuan loans declined. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The data add pressure on President Xi Jinping and Premier </font><a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/li-keqiang/"><font size="3">Li Keqiang</font></a><font size="3"> to shore up growth less than three months into their tenure, after first-quarter expansion unexpectedly slowed. While the figures boost the case for easing monetary policy or approving more spending, the government’s room is limited by rising home prices, financial risks and overcapacity. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“The May data will force China’s leadership and the central bank to rethink growth and inflation -- it seems they were too optimistic about growth and too concerned about inflation,” said Shen Jianguang, chief Asia economist at Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd. in Hong Kong. “It’s a test for China’s leadership to see whether they are determined to reform.” </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-09/china-s-leaders-face-test-of-growth-resolve-after-may-slowdown.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-18869872758827032502013-06-07T09:37:00.001-07:002013-06-07T09:37:03.984-07:00JAPAN’S “THREE-ARROW” POLICY<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-cIabyQPj-R0/UbIMK0_RIVI/AAAAAAAAIjM/5Icl7u0AYOE/s1600-h/The%252520Washington%252520Post%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Washington Post" border="0" alt="The Washington Post" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-DRoJ8-e9Y70/UbIMLmx6JDI/AAAAAAAAIjU/4FvcruwV_OI/The%252520Washington%252520Post_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="230" height="203" /></a></p> <h3>JAPAN’S SHINZO ABE UNDERWHELMING PACKAGE OF ECONOMIC REFORMS</h3> <p><font size="3">Editorial Board </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The Washington Post</em>, June 7, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">JAPAN HAS been in a state of economic stagnation for much of the past two decades. The United States would benefit if this important ally could reverse that trend, aiding not only Japan’s own well-being and national security but also the balance of power in Northeast Asia.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The good news is that there is broad consensus about what ails Japan, and a new prime minister, </font><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/transcript-of-interview-with-japanese-prime-minister-shinzo-abe/2013/02/20/e7518d54-7b1c-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html"><font size="3">Shinzo Abe</font></a><font size="3">, has come into office determined to act. Mr. Abe has fired the first two “arrows” in his </font><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/as-markets-reel-and-public-debt-swells-japans-pm-abe-outlines-reform-strategy-for-economy/2013/06/05/eeddef2e-cd9a-11e2-8573-3baeea6a2647_story.html"><font size="3">“three-arrow” policy</font></a><font size="3">, aiming them at fiscal and monetary policy with the goal of ending Japan’s chronic deflation. His government is spending heavily on infrastructure, and the Bank of Japan has embarked on a massive asset-buying program.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Aggressive as these policies are, enacting them was relatively simple, politically, relative to tackling the third source of Japan’s woes: a vast web of regulations, subsidies and trade barriers whose net effect has been to support inefficient sectors, and the voters who live off them, at the expense of growth and innovation. Japanese productivity has remained essentially flat for the past two decades, a dangerous state of affairs in a country with a shrinking labor force and a growing dependent elderly population.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The politically powerful agriculture sector illustrates how self-defeating Japanese policy can be. Economists </font><a href="http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/1202english_report.pdf"><font size="3">Takeo Hoshi, now at Stanford University, and Anil K. Kashyap of the University of Chicago</font></a><font size="3"> have calculated that Japan’s farms got $53 billion in subsidies in 2010, an amount equal to the total value they added to the economy. In other words, farming made zero net contribution to Japan’s national income.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/japans-shinzo-abe-underwhelming-package-of-economic-reforms/2013/06/06/2711bc98-cee2-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-56662990306880717862013-06-06T02:14:00.001-07:002013-06-06T02:14:41.205-07:00SLOW GROWTH IN CHINA<p><a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-RSfF-ZRcaS8/UbBS_GIkV-I/AAAAAAAAIi0/wvQ2t4-0GYs/s1600-h/Forbes%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Forbes" border="0" alt="Forbes" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-mkJxUOtEw-I/UbBS_y6GFdI/AAAAAAAAIi8/Ny2fPkTmINU/Forbes_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="313" height="91" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA'S SLOW GROWTH CAN BE GOOD NEWS</h3> <p><font size="3">Junheng Li</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Forbes</em>, June 6, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Over the past 33 years, China thrived on a singular economic model: high-volume manufacturing of low-margin products for the rest of world. Today, that growth model has stalled – and not just for cyclical or near team temporary reasons, but because it has come to the end of the line. That is evidenced by the excess capacity that has built up in many sectors such as steel, cement, solar panels and construction materials, as well as the rising cost structure, declining global competitiveness and shrinking corporate profitability of many Chinese companies.</font></p> <p><font size="3">According to a study by brokerage CLSA on 428 publicly traded Chinese companies (excluding banks), corporate margins have declined from approximately 30% in 1997 (before the Asian Financial Crisis) to 10.5% currently. A lack of R&D and innovation has hindered Chinese companies from moving up the value chain, and China is falling behind in global competitiveness. Many state-owned enterprises (SOEs), including state-owned banks, are kept afloat by taking on increasingly more debt from banks or from each other. Excluding banks, Chinese companies’ return on equity has declined by approximately 35%, while corporate leverage has increased approximately 33% since 1997.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The picture is clear. Despite its unprecedented achievement of lifting 500 million people out of poverty in as little as thirty-three years, China’s economy has become a prisoner of its own success.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/junhli/2013/06/05/chinas-slow-growth-can-be-good-news/">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-91060892899210804772013-06-05T04:34:00.001-07:002013-06-05T04:34:02.308-07:00CHINA AND THE SLD<p><strong><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-tiHtCGzB2P8/Ua8iJj8JrwI/AAAAAAAAIic/GPBj6uG9Sdo/s1600-h/asia_times_logo%252520OK%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img title="asia_times_logo OK" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="asia_times_logo OK" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-5NsWiL4rAZo/Ua8iKVCsdMI/AAAAAAAAIik/GXu3M9Mu7E4/asia_times_logo%252520OK_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="303" height="125" /></a></strong></p> <h3>SHANGRI-LA LOST FOR CHINA</h3> <p><font size="3">Bonnie Glaser </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Asia Times</em>, June 5, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">The Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD), launched by the Institute of International Strategic Studies (IISS) in 2002, brings together Asia-Pacific defense ministers and experts from around the world to discuss regional security challenges and opportunities for cooperation. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The 12th SLD convened in Singapore from May 31 to June 2. IISS Director General and Chief Executive John Chipman noted in his opening remarks that the meeting took place "after a year of heightened tensions in the Asia-Pacific, recognizing that defense diplomacy is needed to contain disputes, limit provocations and inspire conflict prevention". </font></p> <p><font size="3">For a vast number of the attendees, much of the instability in the region can be traced to China's assertive defense of its expansive sovereignty claims in the South China Sea and East China Sea.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Concern about China was the main theme of the opening keynote speech delivered by Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung. Although China was not singled out by name, it was clear that his references to growing risks to "maritime security and safety as well as freedom of navigation" were delivered with China in mind.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-050613.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-70192412343689590882013-06-04T02:36:00.001-07:002013-06-04T02:36:52.065-07:00US, CHINA AND NORTH KOREA<p><strong><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-2EL2KxvcD8I/Ua21Lv233EI/AAAAAAAAIiE/JHbEFComg3k/s1600-h/Asia%252520Times%2525202%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Asia Times 2" border="0" alt="Asia Times 2" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-TQGFgSV9x1E/Ua21MlbtnOI/AAAAAAAAIiM/y-Ptui_vYH0/Asia%252520Times%2525202_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="307" height="97" /></a></strong></p> <h3>NORTH KOREA COMMON GROUND FOR US, CHINA</h3> <p><font size="3">George Gao </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Asia Times</em>, June 4, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">UNITED NATIONS - US President Barack Obama is set to host his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, on June 7-8 for their first bilateral meeting as heads of state. Figuring on their agenda is how to address a precarious North Korea, which is armed with a small nuclear arsenal and vying for a bigger one. </font></p> <p><font size="3">In the past seven years, North Korea has suffered a spate of UN Security Council sanctions, the most recent of which was co-drafted by the US and China in March under resolution 2094. The resolution prohibits the transfer of any materials and financial assets into North Korea that may contribute its nuclear program. The resolution also prevents some luxury goods from entering the country. </font></p> <p><font size="3">But in general, UN sanctions have yet to halt North Korea's nuclear developments, much less disarm its nuclear arsenal. </font></p> <p><font size="3">"Clearly, UN sanctions have not been effective, as evidenced by North Korea's continued development and testing of nuclear weapons since sanctions were first introduced in 2006," said Charles K Armstrong, a professor of history at Columbia University and the director of the Center for Korean Research.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-040613.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-22351577411080984432013-06-03T03:23:00.001-07:002013-06-03T03:23:41.138-07:00THE SHANGRI-LA DIALOGUE SEEN BY CHINA<p><a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-qtdREPtNP6Q/UaxuqazX7JI/AAAAAAAAIhs/RnrmiJLElew/s1600-h/BBC_WorldNews%25255B2%25255D.jpg"><img title="BBC_WorldNews_Stack_Rev_RGB [Converted]" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="BBC_WorldNews_Stack_Rev_RGB [Converted]" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-eIi1AZ13mZw/Uaxuq74UnjI/AAAAAAAAIh0/SxevNx_CWHs/BBC_WorldNews_thumb.jpg?imgmax=800" width="244" height="184" /></a></p> <h3>CHINA MEDIA: SHANGRI-LA DIALOGUE</h3> <p><font size="3">BBC News, June 3, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">Media and experts discuss territorial tensions and US military deployments in Asia following a security conference in Singapore, while the Hong Kong press note a rift among the pro-democracy camp ahead of the 4 June vigil. </font></p> <p><a href="http://opinion.huanqiu.com/editorial/2013-06/3994177.html"><b><font size="3">Global Times</font></b></a><font size="3"> expresses disappointment at US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel's declaration at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore that the US will redeploy 60% of its fleet and overseas-based air force to the Asia-Pacific region by 2020. </font></p> <p><font size="3">It says his remarks have spoiled the atmosphere ahead of a key summit between the Chinese and US presidents later this week.</font></p> <p><font size="3">"The military redeployment is a self-deceiving and misguiding effort to check and balance China. This is also an embodiment of the fact that the US is nearly exhausted when it comes to dealing with China's rise," it says.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2013-06/03/content_16557986.htm"><b><font size="3">China Daily</font></b></a><font size="3"> also criticises Mr Hagel's "unwarranted accusations" on Chinese state-backed cyber-attacks.</font></p> <p><font size="3">"Compared with China's consistency, the US is sending a mixed, and even confusing, message... The US defence chief should be told that such unconfirmed allegations neither help solve the issue, nor help build strategic mutual trust between the two countries," it says.</font></p> <p><font size="3">In</font><a href="http://opinion.huanqiu.com/opinion_world/2013-06/3994174.html"><b><font size="3"> Global Times</font></b></a><font size="3">, Han Xudong, a professor at the National Defence University, says "Western" media "hype about China's growing military power and the US' military redeployments serves multiple ulterior motives including helping the US to export more arms as well as build a US-led security system in Asia-Pacific.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-22750009">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-72371873888000451092013-06-02T07:04:00.001-07:002013-06-02T07:04:39.080-07:00US-CHINA TALKS<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-Lc7I2LhpE_Q/UatQ84lY31I/AAAAAAAAIhU/QK5ru46TFn0/s1600-h/The%252520Guardian%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Guardian" border="0" alt="The Guardian" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-KXX0dSYNBSo/UatQ9dZYcqI/AAAAAAAAIhc/h-tGzOeWAmw/The%252520Guardian_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="380" height="76" /></a></p> <h3>CYBERSECURITY TOPS OBAMA'S AGENDA FOR CHINA TALKS</h3> <p><font size="3">Julie Pace (AP)</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The Guardian</em>, June 2, 2013 </font></p> <p><font size="3">AP White House Correspondent= WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama will be looking for signs from China's leader at their upcoming meeting that Beijing is ready to address its reported high-tech spying, which the White House sees as a top threat to the U.S. economy and national security.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The talks between Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping will be followed by a July meeting between U.S. and Chinese officials focusing on cyberespionage, along with other strategic and economic issues. Secretary of State John Kerry announced the U.S.-China meetings when he visited Beijing in April.</font></p> <p><font size="3">The summit Friday and Saturday at a California estate also is aimed at establishing personal ties between Obama and Xi as relations between the two global powers grow increasingly complex.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Obama needs Xi's help in stemming nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran, combating the violence in Syria, and continuing the U.S. economic recovery.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10820255">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-69606030092232599832013-06-01T01:24:00.001-07:002013-06-01T01:24:35.216-07:00CHINA, THE US AND CYBER ESPIONAGE<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-N5lkkw-I8fY/UamvvHi55yI/AAAAAAAAIg8/yqOWRdmo5oQ/s1600-h/The%252520Washington%252520Post%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Washington Post" border="0" alt="The Washington Post" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-WBvo3GY_bxk/UamvwXzVXDI/AAAAAAAAIhE/29LT_dQ5fXw/The%252520Washington%252520Post_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="234" height="206" /></a></p> <h3>HAGEL CHIDES CHINA FOR CYBER ESPIONAGE</h3> <p><font size="3">Ernesto Londono </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The Washington Post</em>, June 1, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">SINGAPORE — Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel took China to task for alleged cyber espionage on Saturday, drawing a sharp response from a Chinese general who questioned whether America’s growing military presence in Asia is anything more than an affront to Beijing’s rise.</font></p> <p><font size="3">Delivering the keynote speech at the Shangri-La Security Dialogue, Hagel said the U.S. is “clear-eyed about the challenges in cyber,” and echoed past administration assertions that the “growing threat of cyber intrusions,” targeting U.S. government and industry portals “appear to be tied to the Chinese government and military.” </font></p> <p><font size="3">It was the latest public charge from the Obama administration, which has concluded that calling out China publicly could curb what U.S. officials call a brazen and sophisticated quest for American secrets stored online. </font></p> <p><font size="3">“We are determined to work more vigorously with China and other partners to establish international norms of responsible behavior in cyberspace,” Hagel said in a conference hall packed with Asian military officials. </font></p> <p><font size="3">China has denied Washington’s accusations, most pointedly last week, when it said it did not need to steal American military hardware blueprints because it was more than capable of producing its own. </font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/hagel-rebukes-china-for-cyber-espionage/2013/06/01/da9c1c6c-ca6f-11e2-9cd9-3b9a22a4000a_story.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-73306031796569435922013-05-31T02:44:00.001-07:002013-05-31T02:44:27.321-07:00INDIA’S GROWTH IN 2013-14<p><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-25GKtKO5HOU/Uahw9UDAw_I/AAAAAAAAIgk/7pq4EfyTQts/s1600-h/The%252520Economic%252520Times%25255B3%25255D.gif"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Economic Times" border="0" alt="The Economic Times" src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-z9_fiDGR-EU/Uahw-YqPGTI/AAAAAAAAIgs/3RS6YpW3mCU/The%252520Economic%252520Times_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif?imgmax=800" width="383" height="78" /></a></p> <h3>INDIA'S FY13 GDP GROWTH HITS DECADE LOW OF 5%</h3> <p><font size="3">Agencies</font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>The Economic Times</em>, May 31, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">NEW DELHI: India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at 4.8% in the fourth quarter of FY13, marginally lower than an ET Now poll estimate of 4.9%. This is a marginal improvement over the Q3 GDP growth rate of 4.7%. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The GDP for the entire FY13 grew at 5%, which is a decade low number. The manufacturing sector of the economy grew at 2.6%. </font></p> <p><font size="3">The consensus estimates of the poll ranged from 4.3% to 5.5%. </font></p> <p><font size="3">India's economic growth was at 6.2 per cent for the 2011-12 fiscal. </font></p> <p><font size="3">It had grown by 5.4 per cent, 5.2 per cent and 4.7 per cent in the first, second and third quarters, respectively, of 2012-13, according to data released by the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) today.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/indias-fy13-gdp-growth-hits-decade-low-of-5/articleshow/20361711.cms">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588091805026284511.post-12462061533307456452013-05-29T04:18:00.001-07:002013-05-29T04:18:45.374-07:00CHINA AND THE WORLD ORDER<p><strong><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-lS13FzM58Yo/UaXkEYzMJkI/AAAAAAAAIgM/QlXYLGd7bC0/s1600-h/asia_times_logo%252520OK%25255B3%25255D.jpg"><img title="asia_times_logo OK" style="border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px" border="0" alt="asia_times_logo OK" src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-vo3jcsefLLM/UaXkE6ObH3I/AAAAAAAAIgU/6Yao34PUWG4/asia_times_logo%252520OK_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="318" height="131" /></a></strong></p> <h3>WORLD EYES CHINA'S COEXISTENCE STRATEGY</h3> <p><font size="3">Liselotte Odgaard </font></p> <p><font size="3"><em>Asia Times</em>, May 29, 2013</font></p> <p><font size="3">China is no longer merely a passive recipient of the world order, but it has become a key factor in determining the foreign and defense policy choices that are open to other international actors. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Beijing seems to have positioned the country as a global great power in a political sense. It has achieved this position by means of a strategy of coexistence that was recently reiterated in the Chinese defense white paper. This strategy is designed to change the context for other states' international behavior without promoting a completely new world order. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Instead, China's version of world order is founded in a revised interpretation of the existing UN system, invoking the principles of absolute sovereignty and non-interference. It is an interest-based order designed to protect China against overseas interference and maintain international peace and stability without any obligations for extensive cooperation. </font></p> <p><font size="3">Beijing seeks to influence the context more often than directly shaping the behavior of other international actors. This coexistence strategy does not require economic and military capabilities at US levels to exercise this type of influence, because it relies on the persuasiveness of its version of world order as an advantage for others without promoting a China-centric model of interaction.</font></p> <p><font size="3">(...) [article <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-290513.html">here</a>]</font></p> Pablo Bustelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03923153256319732252noreply@blogger.com0